AQUATIC AGGREGATOR
  • Home
  • About
  • Nonconventional Bubbler
  • Field Results
  • Tech Comparison
  • Field Evaluation
  • More
    • Home
    • About
    • Nonconventional Bubbler
    • Field Results
    • Tech Comparison
    • Field Evaluation
AQUATIC AGGREGATOR
  • Home
  • About
  • Nonconventional Bubbler
  • Field Results
  • Tech Comparison
  • Field Evaluation

FIELD RESULTS

GULF WATERWARM WATERCOLD WATER

FIELD RESULTS & OBSERVATIONS

 

Technical Consideration


Sound travels significantly faster and farther in water than in air, and many fish species are known to detect vibration, particle motion, and acoustic cues in their environment.


Observed field responses—including upward movement from significant depth and rapid aggregation in open-water environments—suggest acoustic or vibration-related cues may be one contributing factor among several under consideration.

Field testing has been conducted across multiple aquatic environments to evaluate fish aggregation behavior under real-world conditions. Observations include documented results, video evidence, and guide-supported validation.

 

Testing spans:

 

  • Cold-water, high-altitude      reservoirs
  • Warm freshwater lakes
  • Coastal saltwater environments
  • Marsh and canal systems


 COMPLETED TEST LOCATIONS

 
Colorado (Cold / High Altitude)

  

  • Dillon Reservoir (Under Ice)
  • Frisco Dock – Dillon Reservoir
  • Georgetown Lake
  • Arvada Reservoir

 
New Mexico (Multi-Season Validation)

 

  • Elephant Butte Reservoir

 
Texas (Warm Freshwater & Coastal)

  

  • Corpus Christi Bay
  • Sam Rayburn Reservoir

  

Louisiana (Saltwater & Marsh Systems)

  

  • Gulf Open Water Deployment
  • Marsh & Canal Systems      (Delacroix / Shell Island)

Aquatic Aggregator in Operation

Aquatic Aggregator Field Test

 Aquatic Aggregator Bubbling then pans to motor on deck. 

 

FIELD RESULTS & OBSERVATIONS



Field testing has been conducted across multiple aquatic environments to evaluate fish aggregation behavior under real-world conditions. Observations include documented results, video evidence, and guide-supported validation.


Testing spans:


  • Cold-water, high-altitude reservoirs
  • Warm freshwater lakes
  • Coastal saltwater environments
  • Marsh and canal systems



COMPLETED TEST LOCATIONS



Colorado (Cold / High Altitude)


  • Dillon Reservoir (Under Ice)
  • Frisco Dock – Dillon Reservoir
  • Georgetown Lake
  • Arvada Reservoir


New Mexico (Multi-Season Validation)


  • Elephant Butte Reservoir


Texas (Warm Freshwater & Coastal)


  • Corpus Christi Bay
  • Sam Rayburn Reservoir


Louisiana (Saltwater & Marsh Systems)


  • Gulf Open Water Deployment
  • Marsh & Canal Systems (Delacroix / Shell Island)



COLORADO FIELD RESULTS (COLD WATER BENCHMARK)


Dillon Reservoir – Under Ice


Conditions


  • Freshwater (near freezing)
  • Ice thickness: 2–3 feet
  • Low visibility


Observed Results


  • Response time: ~1 hour
  • Gradual aggregation
  • Reduced fish movement


Key Takeaway


Even under extreme ice conditions, fish respond—confirming functionality in low-activity environments.


Frisco Dock – Dillon Reservoir


Conditions


  • Cold, clear water (~45°F–60°F)
  • High altitude (~9,000 ft)
  • High visibility


Observed Results


  • Response time: 5–10 minutes
  • Gradual approach
  • Fish remain deeper before engaging


Key Takeaway


Cold, clear water increases response time, but consistent aggregation still occurs.


Georgetown Lake


Conditions


  • Cold freshwater (~40°F–55°F)
  • High altitude (~8,500 ft)


Observed Results


  • Response time: 15–45 minutes
  • Gradual but steady aggregation


Key Takeaway


Results are consistent across multiple cold-water reservoirs—not location-specific.


Arvada Reservoir (Warm Freshwater)


Conditions


  • Freshwater (~60°F–75°F)
  • Moderate visibility


Observed Results


  • Response time: 1–2 minutes
  • Rapid aggregation
  • Strong sustained activity


Key Takeaway


As water temperature increases, response time decreases significantly.



NEW MEXICO FIELD RESULTS (MULTI-SEASON VALIDATION)


Elephant Butte Reservoir


Winter Testing (January – Cold Water)


Conditions


  • Freshwater (~45°F–55°F)
  • Moderate visibility
  • Reduced fish activity


Observed Results


  • Response time: 3–10 minutes
  • Gradual aggregation


Summer Testing (Warm Water)


Conditions


  • Freshwater (~70°F–85°F)
  • Active fish population


Observed Results


  • Response time: 1–3 minutes
  • Rapid aggregation
  • Fish approach from multiple directions


Guide Observation


“Wow… they are coming in from all sides.”


Guide: Billy Jack Miller
Company: Rio Grande Guide Service


Key Takeaways


  • Performance confirmed across seasonal conditions
  • Response time improves with temperature
  • Aggregation behavior remains consistent



TEXAS FIELD RESULTS


Corpus Christi Bay (Coastal / Saltwater)


Conditions


  • Brackish to saltwater (~75°F–90°F)
  • Tidal movement
  • High baitfish activity


Observed Results


  • Immediate response (seconds)
  • Baitfish arrive first
  • Predator species follow


Guide Observation


 “Holy cow… the screen lit up like a Christmas tree.”
Company: Glen’s Fish Camp & Guide Service


Key Takeaway


Saltwater environments produce the fastest and most visually confirmed aggregation.


Sam Rayburn Reservoir (Warm Freshwater)


Conditions


  • Freshwater (~70°F–85°F)
  • High fish population
  • Depth observed: ~60 ft


Observed Results


  • Fish rising from depth (~60 ft)
  • Strong multi-species aggregation


Guide Observation


“They are coming off the 60-foot bottom. I have never seen that before.”


Guide: Lynn Atkinson
Company: Reel Um N Guide Service


Key Takeaway


Demonstrates vertical fish movement and strong aggregation in deep freshwater systems.


LOUISIANA FIELD RESULTS (TARGET ENVIRONMENT)


Gulf Open Water Deployment


Conditions


  • Saltwater (~75°F–90°F)
  • Open, unconfined environment
  • Tidal movement


Observed Results


  • Response time: seconds to 2 minutes
  • Fish attracted and caught on video
  • Sustained surface and mid-depth activity


Key Behavior Pattern


  1. Baitfish arrive
  2. Predator species follow
  3. Aggregation builds


Key Takeaway


Even in open, unconfined water, rapid aggregation occurs.


Marsh & Canal Systems (Delacroix / Shell Island)


Conditions


  • Brackish water (~75°F–90°F)
  • Shallow canals
  • Low visibility


Observed Results


  • Immediate baitfish concentration
  • Rapid predator response
  • Tight aggregation zones


Guide Reference


Company: Salty Dog (as provided)


Key Takeaway


Highly effective in confined, shallow systems—ideal for canal-based applications.


Application Statement (VERY IMPORTANT)


“These marsh and canal conditions closely resemble Florida canal systems, supporting targeted aggregation strategies for invasive species management.”


CREDIBILITY STATEMENT


All field observations are based on real-world testing conditions. Environmental variables—including water temperature, clarity, and fish population—may influence results. Ongoing testing is being conducted to validate consistent and repeatable performance across diverse aquatic environments.


© 2026 Aquatic Aggregator System. All Rights Reserved.


This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept